??? 26/1/2003 2:03:40 ??, ?/? "Wolfgang Lenerz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ??????:
> >On 25 Jan 2003, at 16:04, Marcel Kilgus wrote: > >> No, fortunately not. Otherwise I would be as depressed as Marvin (as >> anybody hitchhiking through the galaxy should now) ;-) > >Does that mean that you're an android? > >Now THAT explains a lot... > >Don't panic... > >Wolfgang >----------------- >www.wlenerz.com > He has to be an android as he has been working around the clock apparently... at a certain point he sent me more than 3 versions in less than 20 mins ;-))) (Okay just happened once but you get the idea) Well he just finished it (as it looks like ;-) now Aurora supports Mode 4 'weird' resolutions as well (ie 768 x 384) etc. 512 x 480 is now fully supported and so is 512 x 384 (it was anyway). Screen loading even from an MSDOS floppy even beats QPC on the same resolution (okay not the same colours I know but I run QPC on an 2200+ Athlon XP so it's a good enough measure) Graphics are VERY fast, (I am impressed) which also means that when Nasta designed it he knew very well what he was doing :-). I quote also from the Aurora manual that 'Screen access can be further improved' as the hardware supports it, which means that with a GoldFire attached this can be a mean fighting machine ;-) Now anybody to restart production on Auroras for low end (colour wise) QLs? And maybe instead of a SGC, we can use something else. How about the SZ that Nasta had proposed? Phoebus
