Hi, Been there & done that so so boring. No no suprise your file is as corrupt as the others according to bzip2. Have you used the recommended version of tar 0.05 and bzip2 1.0.1. Have you actually checked the integrity of your archive recently. Did anyone actually download a working copy of QDOS Ghostscript ever from the web. What prompted Jonathon Hudson to use this unix combination of archivers for a QDOS archive. Are we supposed to rewrite & recompile the whole Ghostscript file from partially resurrected sources. Is that what Jonathon Hudson intended. It actually would not suprise me if that was the case. Equally it would not at all suprise me if the documentation with these various files was in someway wrong, so average of the expert/commercial part of the QL scene. If anyone cares to challenge this observation I can list specifics chapter, verse, page and line of many manuals.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Phoebus Dokos Sent: 07 February 2003 11:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ql-users] Ghostscript 6.0 Importance: High On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:31:29 -0000, Duncan Neithercut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > Has anyone downloaded ghostscript 6.0 from either Thierry Godefroy's > sofware > repository or Jonathon Hudsons downloads page and sucessfully unpacked > it. > I have tried both using ACP4.01,tar 0.05 and BZip 1.01 from Thierry's > pages. I get partial but different parts decompressed with both archives > src > with one and some docs with the other and an error message with both > archives suggesting that they are corrupt. > > Is there different versions of the decompression programs or some > configuration of them needed? > > Duncan Neithercut > > Try to get it from the actual repository... last time I ran it, it was working fine for me: Go to <URL: http://www.dokos-gr.net/smsrepository/indexsms.html> to find it -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
