On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 20:06:06 +0000, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 at 18:45:12, Roy wood wrote: (ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Arnould Nazarian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writesOne of the main problems with antispam software. Recent enquires about the Text87 patch got bounced because of the word patch in the title.
As you started I continue this off topic conversation: your message was filtered out
by my little antispam utility because of sussex in the signature
Damn, I was just going to ask you how to reanimate my life !!!
I must have had a very protected innocent life. 'patch'? What on earth is the connection there?
Hmmm Nicotine Patch, Birth-Control-Patch, Make your [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ bigger patch etc.
Or of course the usual: New "patch" from Microsoft ... etc.
Phoebus
--
Visit the QL-FAQ at: <http://www.dokos-gr.net/ql/faq/> (Still uploading stuff!)
Visit the uQLX-win32 homepage at: <http://www.dokos-gr.net/ql/uqlx.html>
Visit the uQLX-mac home page at:<http://www.dokos-gr.net/ql/uqlxmac.html>
