Hi there,

if I send a track to my Garmin etrex HCx using QLandkarteGT 1.1.1, the 
elevation 
profile of that track gets corrupted.

If I send the same track to the etrex using gpsbabel, the elevation profile is 
just fine:
gpsbabel -t -i gpx -f file.gpx -o garmin -F usb:

Comparing the two tracks in gpx format after reading them back from the etrex 
shows the difference (height around 725m is correct):

1. point sent using QL
   <trkpt lon="11.63688278" lat="47.74735641">
    <ele>0.137451</ele>
   </trkpt>
   <trkpt lon="11.63714123" lat="47.74739075">
    <ele>0.137451</ele>
   </trkpt>
   <trkpt lon="11.63733864" lat="47.74742508">
    <ele>0.137451</ele>
   </trkpt>
   <trkpt lon="11.63756371" lat="47.74746323">
    <ele>0.137451</ele>
   </trkpt>
   <trkpt lon="11.63771057" lat="47.74747849">
    <ele>0.137451</ele>
   </trkpt>
   <trkpt lon="11.63822460" lat="47.74757004">
    <ele>0.137451</ele>
   </trkpt>

2. same points sent using gpsbabel
   <trkpt lon="11.63688278" lat="47.74735641">
    <ele>724.971</ele>
   </trkpt>
   <trkpt lon="11.63714123" lat="47.74739075">
    <ele>725.452</ele>
   </trkpt>
   <trkpt lon="11.63733864" lat="47.74742508">
    <ele>724.971</ele>
   </trkpt>
   <trkpt lon="11.63756371" lat="47.74746323">
    <ele>726.413</ele>
   </trkpt>
   <trkpt lon="11.63771057" lat="47.74747849">
    <ele>726.894</ele>
   </trkpt>
   <trkpt lon="11.63822460" lat="47.74757004">
    <ele>727.855</ele>
   </trkpt>

Any suggestions, what is going wrong?

Regards,
Robert
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Qlandkartegt-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qlandkartegt-users

Reply via email to