Oliver Eichler <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > > yes this is expected. The number of bytes used to calculate the hash > was in creased.
Ok. I will probably update the views by performing query-replace in the save files. Useful information for doing that if you don't mind would be: Is there an easy way to calculate the hash? Is the old hash a prefix or suffix of the new one? IIUC you just hash more bytes of the map file (?) so the hashes have the same lengths as before and the answer to the second question is "no". TIA, Michael. _______________________________________________ Qlandkartegt-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qlandkartegt-users
