Henning Brauer wrote:

> Please Note that I haven't build my patches for the 200105-patch, I'm still
> using 200103. I will build them for 200106 asap (after looking at the search
> filter routines VERY intensive - these monthly changes due to objectclass
> restriction bugs are really annoying...)
>

Yes, I see. I took a look at the "old" patch (qmail-lspawn.c.patch-20010305),
and that one seems to integrate more properly than the one for 200105.

Franky

Reply via email to