I don't think the indexing directives are much different than 1.x  I
use:

index   uid eq
index   uidNumber eq
index   mail eq
index   mailalternateaddress eq
index   ipHostNumber eq
index   cn eq
index   objectclass eq

Some of those attributes are indexed for different purposes so you
probably won't need all of them.  Also check
http://www.OpenLDAP.org/devel/admin/

nick wrote:
> 
> Indexing seems to make a little sense there. Could you copy me
> the directives I'd need to get the indexing working in openldap
> 2.x, being that the example slapd.conf in QLDAPINSTALL looks a
> little out of date for 2.x?
> 
> And good point about the ACLs too, I was watching the openldap
> logs with the loglevel set to show ACL processing and basically
> my jaw dropped open!
> 
> --
> nick
> 
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Mark Belnap wrote:
> 
> > I observed a similar behavior with my openLDAP/qmail
> > installation.  I can't remember for sure what I did, but I
> > believe that if you index objectClass, mail, and
> > mailAlternateAddress, it won't have to search each of those
> > attributes individually to find whether they match.
> >
> > On a related note, part of my problem was that the access
> > control lists were very complex and ACL processing really
> > slowed things down.  I have since decided to just bind as
> > LDAP rootdn and that makes it much faster...
> >
> > Mark.
> >
> > nick wrote:
> > >
> > > Ive been playing around with qmail-ldap & openldap for a little
> > > while, and I just noticed this in the openldap logs. I only have
> > > 4 entries in the database, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and so on. Now this is the output that was
> > > generated (and chopped up since this is an email) by sending
> > > only one email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > Can someone clue me in as to why the ``mail`` and
> > > ``mailAlternateAddress`` attributes of every other entry are
> > > searched after it already found the entry for
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
> > >
> > > And is this just normal operation for qmail-ldap, or might there
> > > be something wrong in the way I setup openldap?
> > >
> >
> > > nick
> >

Reply via email to