Next to the question of wether or not to answer the poster his question, here's something:
the popbull patch is the only "patch" that does what is being asked, but it does so in a poor manner: again an extra exec for each and every pop-request being done (bringing the total to 4 exec's for one pop: popup, authpasswd, popbull, pop3d). This is not realy a patch, just an extra program put in the pop-chain. It's a very costly manner of achieving what is being asked for (a bulletin). It would be much better if this patch was directly integrated into qmail-pop3d.c Franky On Tue, 25 Dec 2001 19:02:34 +0100 Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 07:31:01PM +0200, Taymour A. El Erian wrote: > > can Russell Nelson's qmail-popbull patch be applied directly to > > qmail-ldap?, if so patch before ldap or after ? > > http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/writings/12-steps-to-qmail-list-bliss.html > > > -- > * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * > * BS Web Services, Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * > Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. > (Dennis Ritchie) >
