I have rolled back to qmail-ldap-20031001 and cleared the queue.. Will take a deeper look tomorrow..
-Dougal
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 17:26, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 23:39, Online Email wrote: > I just did a compile and install on RedHat 8.0 and all is working > fine.. Will let it some for a bit with some traffic... Hope it's not netqmail which is causing your repeated posts to the mailing list... > -Dougal > > > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 15:34, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 11:07:05PM +0100, Sylvain Boily wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Does all patch from netqmail in http://www.qmail.org/netqmail are > > > included in qmail-ldap ? > > > Does futur versions are based from this version or we can always > > > download qmail-1.03 sources ? > > > > > > > I have seen netqmail today for the first time and currently I do not know > > what they changed in it. If it is the obvious bugs in qmail then we are > > already on step further. The current patch was included a major > > ANSI-fication of qmail ($EDITOR *.h). Also the errno, fork() and > > read/write stories should be histroy. > > That's why the compressed patch growed about 20% in one month. > > > > Could anybody with Solaris 9, linux-whatever-is-the-newest and some other > > freaky UNIX variants do a test compile? > > I tested the code on OpenBSD(i386, sparc, sparc64), FreeBSD and MacOS X.
