On 12 Jul 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > But that's one of my problems. I don't want my users sending > messages with another address than the company address. If > they want to send mails using their home address, they should > go to home =)
I see, that's your policy. I've worked in many places and this is the first time I hear of such a restrictive policy; I assumed your policy was more relaxed and your intent was different. Sorry. > I dont get it... Why they should work? Why should I send > messages with mailing lists address in the return-path/from > header since lists don't even recieve bounces. That's not the > purpose of mailing lists. The From: field is usually set to the original sender, even if the actual message is sent by the mailing list software. How would that work with your scheme? If you allow internal addresses, submissions from external subscribers would still have invalid addresses when your SMTP server receives them from the mailing list software. I'm curious how this would be handled, I'm not attacking your policy. Ted
