When yoy say "the server suddenly "freeze" �you must reboot the server? 

�have you passed a tool to analize the hardware? This can be a memory error.


On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 20:10:30 -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi qmail-ldap-list,
> 
>         I'm multi posting this message. I already post it in qmail
> list a few days ago, but I would like the qmail-ldap list opinion.
> :))
> 
>         I have a situation and I can't figure out what is going on,
> the server suddenly "freeze". I'm sending this message looking for
> advices, opinions and things that I can do to solve the "problem"
> or discover how to deal with it. :)
> 
>         Here is the scenario:
> 
>         The server is located on a host provider. It has about 2000
> mails per hour. (aprox. 1 mail -> 2 seconds). The hardware is a Dell
> Machine (PowerEdge series):
> 
>                 2x Intel Xeon 3.0 (Hyper Threading)
>                 3 GB (DDR 400)
>                 2 NIC (Broadcomm NetExtreme tg3) Gigabit
>                 SCSI Controller RAID (Perc3 2 Channels 128M Cache)
>                 3 HDs Ultra 320 140GB
> 
>         It is using RAID 5 (hardware) and LVM for /home and /var.
> All filesystems are XFS. The configuration has a little "hack",
> today it uses vpopmail, but the main idea is change it for LDAP.
> 
>         It is a LWQ instalattion, but we use the qmail-ldap patch,
> and the "hack" I mention before is just the change of checkpassword
> to authenticate against vpopmail. It is not the problem, before we
> do this change was the same behaviour.
> 
>         The system is a Debian Woody, using qmail-scanner 1.22 and
> last version of Panda Anti Virus with all updates. We are also
> using SPAMassassin (pre packaged for woody).
> 
>         What we cannot understand is why the machine freezes
> suddenly. No messages in logs that can help, no errors in dmesg.
> We try to use Clamav but it is slower than panda. qmail-scanner
> seems to be one of the biggest pay load.
> 
>         Before the Debian was a Red Hat, the Operating System was
> very stable but qmail was completely unstable. Now we are trying
> to use it on Debian, qmail is very stable, but not the OS, and
> Debian *is* a very robust and Stable distro.
> 
>         We already try Sarge (kernel 2.6) but Panda has some
> "incompatibilities" with new threads and glibc2.3. As I heard
> many times on the list, there are qmail servers with and "huge"
> amount of messages, so, probably somebody could advice me. :)
> 
>         Thank you in advance, best regards!
> 
> --
> //////////
> // Felipe Augusto van de Wiel
> // Admin. de Redes e Sistemas
> // [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> // http://www.paranacidade.org.br/
> //////////
> 
> 


-- 
Nada es imposible para quien no tiene que hacerlo

Hay que venir de vez en cuando a estos sitios para recordar que no hay
que volver a ellos. G.A.I. (German Amigo del Iosu)



______________________________________________

Reply via email to