i've tested, it worked.
bruno.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: Clustering: Why 'mailhost' has to match ~control/me file? SOLVED

I think the best solution to this problem I've posted in September is letting the 'me' file with the internal name (the name we use in our intranet) and use the qmail-remote control file 'helohost' to specify the external valid DNS name that qmail-remote will use when saying HELO to the remote SMTP servers.
 
I didn't test yet, but it seems it gonna work.
 
bruno.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 12:00 PM
Subject: Clustering: Why 'mailhost' has to match ~control/me file?

Hi all,
 
I'm trying to set qmail-ldap clustering, and i'm following the 'Life with qmail-ldap'  to help me in setting it up.
 
But this document says the following about the 'mailhost' e-mail account attribute:
 
  mailhost
    when clustering is turned on, the server where the user's mail is stored
    is defined here. Note that it MUST match the name given in "me" on the
    affected server.
What's the reason of this? Is it really needed?
 
If this is really needed it is a serious restriction in configuration flexibility, see what's my problem: my e-mail servers stay in internal networks, they don't have valid IP addresses or valid DNS names, instead, they use internal names and IP addresses.
 
When they need to comunicate with external mail servers on the internet, they pass through a NATted firewall wich give for each of them an external valid IP address,  and each of these addresses has a valid DNS named mapped to it.
 
So, in the control/me file, i always set the external valid name instead of the internal - this is needed because some big mail servers check the "HELO my.valid.name.com" against the ip address of the connecting machine. If i set the control/me file to an internal name, the qmail-send will use this internal name when saying HELO to external mail servers, and this is not desirable.
 
Do you understand my point? How are you dealing with this?
 
Thanks,
bruno negr�o

Reply via email to