I put that note there because I, personally, saw Andre O with different eyes after that very moment when I discovered he was the author of "The Big Qmail Picture". I have "The Big Qmail Picture" stuck in a wall right behind be for more than 4 years, and I have to check things on it almost every week. This document is so useful! Yesterday I printed another copy to have it upon my table.

When I met qmail-ldap for the first time, this was last year, when I saw "The Big Qmail-LDAP Picture" I thought to myself - "Hmm... they are smart, they copied The Big Qmail Picture diagram style to explain qmail-ldap...". And I always thought like that until yesterday, when I discovered that Andre was the author of both documents.

I didn't realized that, but Andre was always my teacher in Qmail! This has a big value for me. And I'm sure that it's important for a lot of people too.

And I'm also sure it won't cause any harm if people start being aware Andre is the author of both documents. Will it cause any harm?

Besides that, I think Andre could use the popularity of that document strategically to attract more people to qmail-ldap project. Everybody who works with Qmail goes to www.nrg4u.com to pick that document and don't even notice the existence of qmail-ldap. At least this was what happened to me.

I heard about qmail-ldap for the first time in 2004, on vchkpw (vpopmail) mailing list, in a thread where I was asking about techniques for splitting a domain into 'n' mailservers. If wasn't that guy who suggested me qmail-ldap, I wouldn't know its existence.

Concluding, Andre taught Qmail to everybody through his famous diagram, and this knowledgeable guy is leading qmail-ldap project - this is what is important people to know. And I'd like to know that since the first time I met qmail-ldap.

Regards,
bruno.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Ace Suares" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: I didn't know the famous "The BIG Qmail PICTURE" was made by Andre Oppermann!!


Reply via email to