I don't know if this is helpful, but I was using qscanq, but later found
simscan (www.inter7.com) to be a better program. More complete, actively
developed, and those folks at inter7.com have put together some nice
software for qmail, such as courier-imap, so it seems like they know what
they are doing. I found it much easier to get working than qscanq.
Andreas Stollar
Senior System Administrator
Speakeasy
Direct > 206.971.5108 Mobile > 206.372.0346 Email > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.speakeasy.net Broadband for Open Minds
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Scott Ryan wrote:
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 07:33:08 +0200
From: Scott Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: qscanq
I dont know how many people on this list use qscanq with the QMAILQUEUE patch,
but I was wondering if anyone has used it with reformmime instead or ripmime as
suggested in the documentation.
I have noticed a huge improvememnt in performance since switching and was
wondering if anyone else has noticed the same? I can only assume that ripmime
is trying to do too much...
Just for completeness: I use clamav with the scanMail option disabled
--
slr,
ISP Systems Specialist
Telkom Internet
#qmail-ldap @ irc.freenode.net
This message has been made from 100% recycled bits.
----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT/MU/E d? s+:+ a- C++++>+++++ USL++++$ P++++ !E(---)W+@ !N
o?(--) K? !w(---) O- M+ V PS+@ PE Y-- PGP++>+++ !t(---) !5 !X
R-- !tv b(++) DI++ !D(----) G+++>++++ e++>* h----(*) r+++ y++++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
