On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:10:32AM +0000, Hugo Monteiro wrote: > Andre, Claudio, et al, > > Since DJB changed his lincensing model, putting his work on public > domain, and having read the Qmail-LDAP patch license, which states: > > "This copyright notice applies to the qmail-ldap patch. It does not apply > to the original qmail-1.03 by Dan Bernstein. It also partly applies to > the resulting source and object code. In that Dan Bernsteins copyright > remains intact and is enhanced with ours as derivative work." > > Am i right to assume that the patch itself is now in the public > domain also? I mean, if the DJB software lincense is to remain > intact, then the Qmail-LDAP license, through what is stated, cannot > be more restrictive than the qmail original license, right? > > Please correct me if i'm overlooking any aspect of this. >
No the qmail-ldap patches are under a 4-clause BSD license. Files that were added by our patch actually have a license at the top. The qmail-ldap patch is not in public domain. -- :wq Claudio
