On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 02:01:36PM -0700, Lu wrote: > Observe this relevant modified header: > > Processed in 3.605061 secs); 18 Aug 2002 07:26:58 -0000 > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=20.0 required=5.0 > > It doesn't make sense that X-Spam-Status would indicate No after > receiving a hits higher than the required hits to be labelled as spam.
Qmail-Scanner uses the exit code of spamc to tell it whether it's spam or not - it must have exited "0" even though it had a high score... Bug with spamc I'd say... -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
