On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> You are doing something wrong or your math is horribly bad.  My average
> time in qmail-scanner-queue with Kaspersky is 0.209551 seconds.

Yes, I meant to say .2.  However, from looking at the logs closer, it
varies wildly between .02 and 1.2 (the .02s are probably messages with no
actual attachments), but .2 is a safe estimate.  What's even better is
when you consider that kavdaemon is actually parsing the entire message
itself.  Like I said, I disable &deconstruct_msg and let kavdaemon take
care of parsing the mime message/looking inside zips, etc.

> (and actually, clamav is a little faster and freeer (is that a word?),
> taking 0.127474 seconds per scan on a comparable machine, of course I
> have no idea on the file sizes scanned, just parsing the logs)

When we first started scanning our mail servers, the higher-ups agreed
that $200/year was acceptable to have some level of support if needed.
clamav looks nice, but please tell me I'm reading this wrong:

http://www.openantivirus.org/latest.php
VirusSignatures-latest.zip last modified October 29 2002 09:36:10 AM

Is the OpenAntiVirus project still alive?  If not, how are you getting
definition updates?

RF


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
_______________________________________________
Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general

Reply via email to