Hello everyone, I received a very obvious spam in my Inbox today, and I was surprised that SpamAssassin's Bayes didn't catch it. Examining the headers revealed that indeed Bayes was not consulted:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=1.5 tests=HTML_30_40, HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 I noticed that the spam was addressed to two people at my domain - not just me - and I'm using per-user Bayes via spamc. So I edited the message to take out the other recipient and re-injected the message into the queue. Bayes gave it a confidence of 99; the message ended up with 6 points total. Can qmail-scanner be configured to expand recipient addresses and call spamc for each recipient? Or will this require patching? If it will require patching... is it a good idea? Or would it be vulnerable to some kind of DoS (ie. send a mail with 500 recips only costs ~200kb of bandwidth, but internally qmail-scanner will expand it into 100,000kb for qmail to deal with). -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrator, tgpsolutions http://www.tgpsolutions.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
