Hi lists.

I'm comparing three variant of qmail-scanner w/heavily patched qmail.

#1 qmail-scanner-1.22        (original)
#2 qmail-scanner-1.22-st     (q-s-1.22st-20040606.patch.gz)
#3 qmail-scanner-1.22-st-qms (qmail-scanner-1.22-st-qms-20040530.patch)

Every QS works fine except 3 points below.

1)
I wonder that both patched QS doesn't have SPAM_REPORT info any more,
even original has it. Like below,

original QS:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=6.3 tests=BAYES_00,GAPPY_SUBJECT, (etc...)

patched QS:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=6.3 (that's all)

Just hits=xx and required=xx, no other info there.
It's not my expected.

Patched QS have set $sa_alt='1' and $sa_debug='1'.
I found articles from list archive about spamc option 
to switch fast_spamassassin to verbose_spamassassin by removing '-c'.
so i've removed '-c' option from $spamc_options, but doesn't help.

2)
I can't see any add_header xxx, like X-Spam-DCCD-Results:,
X-Spam-Bayes-Score: which are added into local.cf.

3)
I can't get terse_report=1 style notification any more.
yes, Original one does.

I know st-patch is a heavily modifying against QS,
but I don't think this is a normal behavier.

Well, I like functions provided by st and st-qms very much.
so, How/what should i do to see/put those info in header
like original QS does?
Anyone else have experienced like me?


Thanks for your help.
mitch

-- 
Musashino-shi, Tokyo, Japan
K12LTSP in Japanese ; http://open-mitch.dyndns.org/k12ltsp/



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
_______________________________________________
Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general

Reply via email to