On Wed, 23 Dec 1998, Dax Kelson wrote: > Sounds like Dan is *promoting* "Frivolous Incompatibilities" with the rest > of the Unix universe. This is also frivolously incompatible with the rest of qmail. Under DJB's line of reasoning why have *any* control files??? It would be more secure just to compile in everything. If you ever need to change it, just bust out the binary editor and go to work. This would remove all that silly control file opening and parsing code which we all know is a security disaster waiting to happen. Dax Kelson Internet Connect, Inc.
- Re: System integrity verification and other delusions Peter C. Norton
- Re: System integrity verification and other delusions D. J. Bernstein
- Re: System integrity verification and other delusions Peter C. Norton
- Re: System integrity verification and other delusions Russell Nelson
- Re: System integrity verification and other delusions D. J. Bernstein
- Re: System integrity verification and other delusions D. J. Bernstein
- Re: System integrity verification and other delusions Mate Wierdl
- DJB is promoting "Frivolous Incompatibilities&qu... Dax Kelson
- Re: DJB is promoting "Frivolous Incompatibilitie... Dax Kelson
- Re: DJB is promoting "Frivolous Incompatibilitie... Marius Vollmer
- Re: DJB is promoting "Frivolous Incompatibilitie... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: System integrity verification and other delusions Russell Nelson
- Re: System integrity verification and other delusions Vern Hart
- var-qmail packages and qmail-run packages D. J. Bernstein
- Re: System integrity verification and other delusions Mate Wierdl
- Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Russell Nelson
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Dave Sill
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Bill Parker
