>> No, it gives you recourse when they don't. The difference means that >> the service will require lots of babysitting. > >Or a deposit. Requiring a deposit would probably prevent a good bit of spam. Unfortunately market conditions make it impossible to do so and compete with other ISPs who choose not to require a deposit. shag
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russell Nelson
- Re: Three solutions for spam l41484
- Re: Three solutions for spam Racer X
- Re: Three solutions for spam Mike Meyer
- Re: Three solutions for spam Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Three solutions for spam Mike Meyer
- Re: Three solutions for spam Dave Sill
- Re: Three solutions for spam Mike Holling
- Re: Three solutions for spam Tim Pierce
- Re: Three solutions for spam Paul Graham
- Re: Three solutions for spam Racer X
- Re: Three solutions for spam Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Three solutions for spam Racer X
- Re: Three solutions for spam Dave Sill
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russell Nelson
- Re: Three solutions for spam Len Budney
- Re: Three solutions for spam Charles Cazabon
- Postage for email Len Budney
- Re: Three solutions for spam Russ Allbery
- Re: Three solutions for spam johnjohn
- Re: Three solutions for spam Sam
