>if you didn't sound so unpleasant i'd be more sympathetic to your
premise.
>however that aside i'll just observe that, like many people you're
making
>assumptions that work for you but might not where someone doesn't have a
>(reasonable) choice.
I don't believe there are any places where someone doesn't have another
reasonable choice. The only possible exceptions to this are areas where
local telcos still have legally-enforced monopolies on all facets of
communications service. To those people, I'll say I'm sympathetic to
your plight, but if you expect me personally to do anything about it,
you'll be waiting a long time. All I can suggest is to work within your
laws to deregulate your telcos, or move to a more enlightened country.
>i could say that you're whining over your technical inability to find a
>solution less ham-fisted than the one you've chosen but it's apparent
that
>you can only see the world through holier-than-thou-isp tinted glasses.
>it's a common problem that when you make hammers for a living every
problem
>starts to look like a nail.
And I could say you're a typical end-user who doesn't really have any
idea about the technical, legal and financial issues involved, and that
your own ignorance leads you to believe that I don't know what I'm doing
and that you could do it better.
I'd be more than happy to see whatever other solutions you have that will
accomplish the same goals. I noticed that you didn't bother to offer any
here, despite the fact that you think I could use some help. Perhaps
you're a consultant looking to sell your services?
shag