Matthew Kirkwood writes:

> That's basically my point.  Whether Solaris, Linux or BSD is "better"
> (whatever that means in this case) is not too relevant to me.  They would
> all, I think, do a more than adequate job.
> 
> And NT/Exchange simply can't cope with much more than a light load.

Linux+Samba is faster than NT server under the exact same hardware.

http://www.zdnet.com/sr/stories/issue/0,4537,2196106,00.html

Reply via email to