Just use mutt. ( http://www.mutt.org )
(And yes, I'm not using it now. Qmail comes to my work account because
I'm too lazy to move it. I use mutt for all my other lists and it works
great. It is able to recognize lists and when you want to reply to a
list address it can handle it w/no need to munge reply-to's. Check it
out.)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rok Papez [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 19, 1999 4:41 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Qmail mailing list and ReplyTo:
>
> On 18 Feb 1999 23:03:26 -0000, Russell Nelson wrote:
>
> >The problem (as I see it) is that there is no requirements or even
> >guidelines for MUAs. How's about we get all the mailing list manager
> >people together, and bash out a set of requirements that a mailing
> >list-friendly MUA will have. Then we either find a group to publish
> >them, or else create our own group, and publish them ourselves.
> >
> >Yeah, it's work, but arguing about inserting reply-to is also work.
> :)
>
> It already works grat with PMMail (it is also available for Windows).
>
> The mailing list sets the Reply-To: address to the mailing list, the
> From: field is preserved. When I hit the Reply buttin in PMMail (MUA),
> he notices the difference between the "From:" and "Reply-To:" list,
> pops up a quick dialog asking me to choose to whom to reply; to the
> list
> (Reply-To) or to the poster (From:). Voila.. problem solved.
>
> Of course.. we could define.. if Reply-To is already set, maybe the
> mailing list should preserve it (so the people not subscribed to the
> mailing list could set the Reply-To to their private mailbox or
> some place else).
>
>
>
> best regards,
> Rok Papez,
> Student at Faculty of Computer and Information Science,
> University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
