Juan Carlos Castro y Castro wrote:
> > But it would fix in no way the problems in this thread.
>
> Maybe it would be too much for the person who originally brought the
> question, because users would be unable to do anything with their .qmail
> while what the guy wanted was only to prevent them from running
> programs. But I fail to see why the problem wouldn't be solved.
If only .qmail-extension is disabled, people can still pipe data into a
shell in their .qmail file.
Matthias
--
w e b f a c t o r y | matthias pigulla
www.webfactory.de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: dot-qmail security Scott D. Yelich
- Re: dot-qmail securi... Brian Reichert
- Re: dot-qmail security Vince Vielhaber
- Re: dot-qmail security Mate Wierdl
- Re: dot-qmail security xs
- Re: dot-qmail security Matthias Pigulla
- Re: dot-qmail securi... Juan Carlos Castro y Castro
- Re: dot-qmail securi... Markus Stumpf
- Re: dot-qmail securi... Juan Carlos Castro y Castro
- Re: dot-qmail securi... Markus Stumpf
- Re: dot-qmail securi... Matthias Pigulla
- Re: dot-qmail securi... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: dot-qmail security Joel Eriksson
- Re: dot-qmail security Scott Schwartz
- Re: dot-qmail security Joel Eriksson
- Re: dot-qmail security Markus Stumpf
- Re: dot-qmail security Richard Letts
- Re: dot-qmail security Stefan Paletta
