Hello,
Is it possible to setup AutoTURN so that the user doesn't have to have a
static IP? So far that's the only downside I've seen.
-j
---
Robert J. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.siscom.net
Looking to outsource news? http://www.newshosting.com
SISCOM Network Administration - President, SISCOM Inc.
Phone: 937-222-8150 FAX: 937-222-8153
-----Original Message-----
From: Anand Buddhdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Petr Novotny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Van Liedekerke Franky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, March 18, 1999 8:53 AM
Subject: Re: ETRN, qmail-1.03 and etrn patch v0.1f
>On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 12:10:31PM +0000, Petr Novotny wrote:
>
>> That's one part of the truth. The rest is that for
>> maildir/maildir2smtp you need to know _in advance_ for which domains
>> you have this feature. ETRN is much more democratic - every domain
>> for which you have the mail in queue can ask you to deliver it now.
>
>With qmail's model, this can be a problem. If you are already delivering
>messages at full concurrency, and then 3 or 4 domains send ETRNs around the
>same time, they will be starved. qmail may not finish up existing
>deliveries for quite a while, and these domains will have to wait until
>then. That's why I maintain that ETRN in qmail is not the best way.
>
>AutoTURN is much better, because each client gets their own process to send
>them email, and the serialization isn't so bad, because modem connections
>are slow anyway. Using maildirs gives many advantages too, like control
>over size and filtering messages at the ISP to save downstream sites from
>unwanted messages, especially for sites that have to pay for connect time
>and volume.
>
>--
>System Administrator
>See complete headers for address, homepage and phone numbers
>
