"Scott D. Yelich" wrote: > This may not be the place to ask... and I'm not sure I'd like > the answers -- but I'll ask anyway: > > (1) is it standard (practice) to link cc to gcc? (and who says it is > standard practice?) > and > (2) how many people here have done this? > > As far as linking cc to gcc breaking things. I'll provide examples. > Say, was the SunOS cc ansi compatible? I really do remember > commany line options to cc that didn't work with gcc and > vice-versa. > > Scott Any Linux distribution has cc linked to gcc. Concerning AIX: i sometimes use an AIX 3.2.5 old box, where cc was present. This compiler is still doing a good job (i've used it to compile perl 5.00502 for example). This box was installed in '93. Fabrice
- Re: poor documentation example Cris Daniluk
- Re: poor documentation example Racer X
- Re: poor documentation example Vince Vielhaber
- Re: poor documentation example Sam
- Re: poor documentation example Scott D. Yelich
- Re: poor documentation example Russ Allbery
- Re: poor documentation example Stefan Paletta
- Re: poor documentation example Sam
- Re: poor documentation example Russ Allbery
- Re: poor documentation example Scott D. Yelich
- Re: poor documentation example Fabrice Scemama
- Re: poor documentation example Cris Daniluk
- Re: poor documentation example Sam
- Re: poor documentation example Mark E Drummond
- Re: failure notice (fwd) Jos Backus
- failure notice (fwd) Andy Walden
- RE: failure notice (fwd) Anonymous
- failure notice (fwd) Anonymous
- Re: failure notice (fwd) Anonymous
- Re: failure notice (fwd) Anonymous
- Re: failure notice (fwd) Timothy L. Mayo
