>It hasn't improved over itself much since 1.00, so the reasons >probably haven't changed since their last evaluation, which was >negative. qmail itself hasn't had terribly major changes, but a lot of things have been added along side qmail which make it much more attractive, such as dot-forward, fastforward and rblsmtpd, as well as the ability to deliver to /var/mail via the local mailer (OK, it could always do that, but Dan now ships samples that use mail.local and procmail). In particular dot-forward, fastforward and /var/mail delivery are pretty major improvements if you're very attached to sendmail. Evan
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Juan Carlos Castro y Castro
- /var, /opt, /package D. J. Bernstein
- Re: /var, /opt, /package Russ Allbery
- Re: /var, /opt, /package Markus Stumpf
- Re: /var, /opt, /package Peter Samuel
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Fred Lindberg
- RE: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Soffen, Matthew
- Question, and contributions. Evan Champion
- Question, and contributions. Mike Meyer
- RE: Question, and contributions. Stefan Paletta
- Re: Question, and contributions. Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Question, and contributio... Mike Meyer
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Paul Farber
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Mate Wierdl
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distributing qmail Edward S. Marshall
- the IBM Secure Mailer license D. J. Bernstein
- Re: the IBM Secure Mailer license Dave Sill
- Re: the IBM Secure Mailer license Peter Samuel
