Vince Vielhaber writes: > But how many would it take for DoS? Use up all the inodes? Still no > mail would be lost AFAICT. Well, qmail wouldn't accept any new mail, but it's known that some programs do not listen to the return code from /usr/lib/sendmail. So some mail may indeed be lost. Not that that's a qmail problem -- postfix would have the same problem. -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://crynwr.com/~nelson Crynwr supports Open Source(tm) Software| PGPok | There is good evidence 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | that freedom is the Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | cause of world peace.
- Fw: Anonymous Qmail Denial of Service Adam D. McKenna
- Re: Fw: Anonymous Qmail Denial of Servi...
- Re: Fw: Anonymous Qmail Denial of S... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Fw: Anonymous Qmail Denial ... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Fw: Anonymous Qmail Den... Harald Hanche-Olsen
- Re: Fw: Anonymous Qmail Den... Mate Wierdl
- Re: Fw: Anonymous Qmai... Harald Hanche-Olsen
- Re: Fw: Anonymous ... Mate Wierdl
- Re: Fw: Anonym... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Fw: Anonym... Harald Hanche-Olsen
- Re: Anonymous Qmail Denial of Se... Russell Nelson
- Re: Anonymous Qmail Denial of Se... Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Fw: Anonymous Qmail Denial of S... Sam
- Re: Fw: Anonymous Qmail Denial ... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Fw: Anonymous Qmail Den... Mate Wierdl
- Re: Fw: Anonymous Qmai... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Fw: Anonymous Qmail Denial ... Harald Hanche-Olsen
- Re: Fw: Anonymous Qmail Denial ... Mate Wierdl
- Re: Fw: Anonymous Qmail Den... Stefaan A Eeckels
- Re: Fw: Anonymous Qmai... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Fw: Anonymous ... Stefaan A Eeckels
