> If companies would just get it that ALL of their PC users need training and
> rules to follow (like never turn off macro protection or you get canned)
If this is the case.. then why have macros be able to be executed in
the first place? It seems that people *want* this convenience, but then
they don't want to live with the consequences. Sorry, mickeysoft isn't
smart enough to give it both ways to the user.
> > My car is "user-friendly" and easy to use, so are you saying that if
> > I go out and drive at 100mph and crash that it's Ford's fault for
> > not limiting the maximum speed of my car?
Seems to be that way with cigarettes.
> >Dismissed - invalid analogy. You need a licence to drive a car. You
> >probably did some tests to prove you know what you're doing. If there
> >were no licence for driving a car, Ford would make a car that would
> >limit your maximum speed.
analogies can always have faults. who cares.
Scott
