Aaron L. Meehan write:
> Well I say one thing here: it would be nice if AOL's TTL for the zone
> was a bit higher. An hour seems a bit low and not net-friendly since
> there are so many MX lookups, etc, for aol.com. Am I being
> unreasonable or just highly pedantic? :) I have a mind to gather some
> stats..
I've always wanted to be able to tweak the DNS servers to apply a formula
to the TTLs to derive a new TTL that I want the server to really use, one
that can be constrained by my own intents. That might not make others
happy, but I have found some places with TTLs less that 5 minutes. I'd
also like to see separate timings for "TTR" (Time To Refresh) where the
data is requeried after TTR and replaced with the answer is received,
but not removed unless TTL passes with no answer (TTR < TTL, obviously).
But I guess we don't have qnamed yet.
--
Phil Howard | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phil | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
at | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ipal | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dot | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
net | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
