Yes and yes. I should have made that clearer from the beginning.
No prob.
Dirk
On Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 10:00:15PM -0700, Mark Delany wrote:
> And er, you send this on a regular basis and that's the only unique aspect
> of the email?
>
> If that is the case, then my apologies. You are right. My earlier suggestion
> does not apply if you need to put the recipient address in the body of the
> email.
>
> At 09:21 PM Thursday 4/8/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Huh?
> >
> >A message looks like something like this:
> >
> >------
> >To: xxxx
> >...
> >
> >This message was sent to xxxx....
> >
> >------
> >
> >What the sed below does is replace xxxx with the recipient's email
> >address. So each email is different from the other. It can't be delivered
> >as one email with multiple recipients.
>
> Right. It did occur to me that that was technical possible, but it didn't
> occur to me that that was a likely definition of a unique email per user. I
> personally would use the VERP support within qmail to take advantage of the
> suggested method, but I suspect you'll explain that it's important that the
> recipient see their original email address in the body of the email as
> opposed to the headers where VERP support puts it.
>
>
> Regards.
>
