[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > If neither gets over 100K deliveries per hour then I'll have to > write my own "gattling gun" SMTP delivery thingy and just feed > messages to qmail that have problems. Are you sure you're not a spammer? You're performance needs seem to be mind-boggling, yet you refuse to throw more hardware at the problem (which I would expect any large, legitimate business to do). -- 103. In Company of your Betters be not longer in eating than they are lay not your Arm but only your hand upon the table. -- George Washington, "Rules of Civility & Decent Behaviour"
- Re: qmail speed Bruce Guenter
- Re: qmail speed Peter C. Norton
- Re: qmail speed Bruce Guenter
- Re: qmail speed Mark Delany
- Re: qmail speed Lorens Kockum
- Re: qmail speed Mark Delany
- Re: qmail speed ddb
- Re: qmail speed Dave Sill
- Re: qmail speed dirk
- Re: qmail speed Richard Shetron
- Re: qmail speed budney-lists-qmail
- Re: qmail speed dirk
- Re: qmail speed Chris Garrigues
- Re: qmail speed Sam
- Re: qmail speed Mark Delany
- Re: qmail speed David Villeger
- Re: qmail speed Dave Sill
- Re: qmail speed Richard Letts
- Re: qmail speed Mark Delany
- Re: qmail speed Craig I. Hagan
- Re: qmail speed David Villeger
