On Thu, Apr 29, 1999 at 08:55:07AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > We're not paid and don't have time to spend hours poring over the > documentation, there's more important things to do like deal with > customers. If you're too busy to read the documentation, hire someone to do it for you. > I *know* that qmail is good, fairly simple to install and secure. But > a bit more acceptance that the documentation and other help isn't all > *that* brilliant would reduce the sort of problems that > non-professional users have installing it. If you're not a professional, maybe you should not be setting up a mail server. --vince
- Qmail is not a replacement for Sendmail Pike
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for Sendmail yves
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for Sendmail Mark Delany
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for Sendmail Vince Gonzalez
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for Sendmail Julian L.C. Brown
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for Sendmail Chris Green
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for Send... Stefaan A Eeckels
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for Sendmail Chris Green
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for Send... Vince Vielhaber
- Stop! Now! (was Re: Qmail is not a... Eddie Irvine
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for Sendmail ddb
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for Sendmail Justin Bell
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for Send... Roger Merchberger
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for Sendmail Paul J. Schinder
