On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 08:36:39PM +0100, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> On 26-Jan-99 16:06:07, Fred Lindberg wrote something about "Unable to run
>qmail-remote from resource exthaustion PERMENENT error?". I just couldn't help
>replying to it, thus:
> > Testing ezmlm stuff on a 486/32MB I ran into some resource exhaustion,
> > and noticed that qmail-remote crashing is a permanent error, while an
> > inability to fork qmail-remote is a permanent error. This seems
> > incorrect and caused loss of a message.
loss or bounce?
> > Log (the second entry is a crash leading to the expected deferral):
> > Jan 26 11:56:10 id qmail: 917351770.477256 status: local 0/10 remote
> > 40/40
> > Jan 26 11:56:10 id qmail: 917351770.832994 delivery 7497: failure:
> > Unable_to_run_qmail-remote./
>
> I saw the same thing today. Resource exhaustion (memory) leading to that
> error message and bounced mail. Not good at all.
Greetz, Peter.
--
.| Peter van Dijk
.| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
