-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Russ went a little too far, I think. "Ability to ask questions that
> demonstrate that one has read the documentation and that include at
> least some of the relevant details" would be good enough. One can't
> expect someone to know exactly which information is required if they
> don't know what the problem is.
Right. I'm not a QMAIL expert. I do not want to be. I just want to
install it and have it work. I do know 80% (probably more) of sendmail,
although I only needed to know how to compile to get it to install.
I now have set up a sparc Sparc of mine at home (LX, 96MB ram, 4GB disk)
so that I can DJB'ify it with DJBware. I have broken my home mailer
since I can't figure out how to get rblsmtpd started the same way that I
got it started when I last spent days working on it.
So, anyway, the bottom line here is that now I will finally start
producing those docs taht everyone says that anyone can write if they
don't think the current docs are sufficient. Of course, the docs are
going to be written by someone who is not a qmail expert and will thus
reflect that (and certainly receive very harsh treatment from this list
because the docs may not just be 100% correct with everything).
I am going to do it anyway -- if nothing else, then for myself when I
next am asked to install qmail at some un-suspecting site.
Scott
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBNzJFRFvCesh4C4FtAQFOmQP8CvMbLK+m1Ud2qVOa+aQr5qL6UeaKXxR1
uO9sNZZu6UsD11qV4kvulJOJUFyvsZNUCAC5u/l508q8TAlBMy7Ga3Ngr/bgJVNk
/gRPukVMJxCC/QImRTQrZeYNBGw7CTLNyaRcLv5W9af1wU4V9UDFppxf851scL3/
29h5yETy9Fs=
=+lmX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
