Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, if bandwidth is really at a premium at your site, you should > consider compressing your outgoing email. That recalls something I've pondered lately. Why not implement a QMQP-like protocol in which the "data" portion of the exchange is compressed? That would help bandwidth-challenged hosts (especially dialup users), and _might_ offer a performance gain when the recipient MX supports CQMQP. "Might" because, of course, that would need to be profiled... Len. -- He that hath no rule over his own spirit is like a city that is broken down, and without walls. --Proverbs 25:28
- Re: Multiple outgoing messages Mark Carpenter
- Re: Multiple outgoing messages Chris Johnson
- Re: Multiple outgoing messages Mark Carpenter
- Re: Multiple outgoing messages Mark Carpenter
- Re: Multiple outgoing messages Chris Johnson
- Re: Multiple outgoing messages Mark Delany
- Re: Multiple outgoing messages Mate Wierdl
- Re: Multiple outgoing messages Chris Johnson
- qmail-stmpd receiving mail from ccMail kbo
- Re: Multiple outgoing messages Russell Nelson
- Re: Multiple outgoing messages Len Budney
- Re: Multiple outgoing messages cap
- RE: Multiple outgoing messages Joe Garcia
- Re: Multiple outgoing messages Paul Schinder
- Re: Multiple outgoing messages Frank D. Cringle
- Re: Multiple outgoing messages Mark Delany
- Re: Multiple outgoing messages Frank D. Cringle
- Re: Multiple outgoing messages Sam
- FW: Multiple outgoing messages Joe Garcia
