On Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 10:08:03AM +0200, Peter van der Landen wrote:
> I wouldn't dream of doing this myself but maybe Dan could implement it with
> proper locking.
It would have to go in qmail-send, which will probably look rather different
in 2.0. That's my guess.
> The very fact that messing with the queue while qmail-send is running is a
> big Nono is what would make this a useful addition IMHO.
Agreed.
Who knows, maybe 2.0 will have a generalized delivery type:
local/remote/bounce/discard/..., and the possibility to change it on the fly
for a given message.
Cheers,
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ "Reliability means never
_/ _/ _/ having to say you're sorry."
_/ _/_/_/ -- D. J. Bernstein
_/ _/ _/ _/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _/_/ _/_/_/ use Std::Disclaimer;
