On Tue, 13 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I just sent out 300 messages using qmail-remote in about 4 seconds.
>*sigh*, qmail remote is fast, but you have to pass it information like you
>state below, such as the prefer MX host, which over course a simple perl
>wrapper could find, but well...
>
>I still remember qmail being very fast on other servers. Why isn't my
>concurrentremote filling up? I see in logs an average of 1-3/75 and
>that's it.
>
>-jeremy
You'd be better off doing a couple other things with your time (rather
then whining here)
1.) Look at qmail-inject, and see if that can help you test the machine
for proper delivery statistics (might also look into getting qmail-analog)
2.) See if it's possible to use qmail-inject with their java system
A. If it's not possible, then try convincing the higher ups that the
system needs to be modified by doing the following:
1.) Show them how much faster an untuned qmail
installation can be over their "custom" setup.
2.) Show them the benefits of the modularity of qmail, and
how easily it can be modified to do what they want. (there are people on
this list that will contract themselves to custom write anything you need,
i'm sure russ can help you out, he's a genius when it comes to qmail
(among other things))
_ __ _____ __ _________
______________ /_______ ___ ____ /______ John Gonzalez/Net.Tech
__ __ \ __ \ __/_ __ `__ \/ __ /_ ___/ MDC Computers/netMDC!
_ / / / `__/ /_ / / / / / / /_/ / / /__ (505)437-7600/fax-437-3052
/_/ /_/\___/\__/ /_/ /_/ /_/\__,_/ \___/ http://www.netmdc.com
[---------------------------------------------[system info]-----------]
1:50pm up 158 days, 20:53, 2 users, load average: 1.09, 0.35, 0.17
