Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | The original envelope address is: | A B@ARPA | | It is only encoded as: | <"A B"@ARPA> Rather than arguing about what "is" means, I simply observe (again) that for any value of "is" qmail-smtpd wrongly transforms <"A B"@ARPA> into <A B@ARPA>, and wrongly behaves differently than qmail-inject. It's not a question of encoding one thing two different, valid ways. It's a question of transforming a valid encoding into an invalid one.
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? (Re: New spammer exploit .... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? (Re: New spammer exploit .... Scott Schwartz
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? (Re: New spammer exploit .... Sam
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? (Re: New spammer exploit .... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? (Re: New spammer exploit .... Sam
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? (Re: New spammer exploit .... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? (Re: New spammer exploit .... Sam
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? (Re: New spammer exploit .... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? (Re: New spammer exploit .... Scott Schwartz
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? (Re: New spammer exploit .... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? (Re: New spammer exploit .... Scott Schwartz
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? (Re: New spammer exploit .... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? Scott Schwartz
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Eliding quotes in envelope? Scott Schwartz