<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >[After switching from syslog to cyclog] My average concurrent remote >went from 4 to 76. Nice. Remember when I told you to run ps/top/iostat/vmstat, and you said they were all normal? Guess what? You were wrong. You should have seen syslogd consuming large chunks of CPU time and/or I/O. Perhaps next time, instead of declaring them normal, you could post the output so others can see what you missed. Oh, and if you'd installed using the LWQ installation instructions, you never would have had this problem. I gave up on syslog years ago. -Dave
- Re: *sigh* performance issues again. Please help! Dave Sill
- Re: *sigh* performance issues again. Please help! jeremy
- Re: *sigh* performance issues again. Please help! Reid Sutherland
- Re: *sigh* performance issues again. Please help! jeremy
- Re: *sigh* performance issues again. Please help... Tommi Virtanen
- Re: *sigh* performance issues again. Please ... Bruce Guenter
- Re: *sigh* performance issues again. Please help! Alex at Star
- Re: *sigh* performance issues again. Please help! jeremy
- Re: cyclog, was *sigh* performance issues again. Ple... John R. Levine
- Re: cyclog, was *sigh* performance issues again. ... Chris Garrigues
- Re: cyclog, was *sigh* performance issues again. ... Russell Nelson
- Re: cyclog, was *sigh* performance issues aga... Russell Nelson
- Re: cyclog, was *sigh* performance issues again. ... johnjohn
- Re: cyclog, was *sigh* performance issues aga... Bruce Guenter
- Re: cyclog, was *sigh* performance issues again. ... vogelke
- Re: *sigh* performance issues again. Please help! Fred Lindberg
