On Thu, 29 Jul 1999, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> > A recent attack? Or the one that took them down months ago? The
> the one that took them down mounths ago.
>
> > "official" word of the last attack was that it was a sniffed (root?)
> > password and/or some ssh+kerberos issue.
>
> IBM and SSH Corp. assured that there was no bug in ssh package!
So they gave up and just blamed qmail? Doubtful. I tend to think it
was a sniffed password.
>
> > Of course, it's easy to use qmail to run commands if you have ftp access
> > and write permissions to the .qmail* files. Of course, this isn't
> > considered a bug.
>
> .qmail* (Are you referring to /var/qmail/alias/.qmail* ?)
Or one in the user's $HOME dir.
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] flame-mail: /dev/null
# include <std/disclaimers.h> TEAM-OS2
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================
