-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
> I didn't say anonftpd was secure. I said that the ftp server I'm
> using was insecure (wuftpd -- check it out on www.rootshell.com), and
> that by comparison, anonftpd was secure. Everything in the security
> field is relative -- and only needs to be.
Exactly. As I have mentioned, my site is a continual target and is
usually under continuous attack. I'm interested in protecting my sites
that use Qmail and have user level FTP... that's all. Of course, if you
have run across anything that's at all remotely decent in terms of
security, I'd love to hear about it (perhaps in a private message).
Scott
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBN6dTix4PLs9vCOqdAQFGNQP9HTcaoipLFPs4XUn+IytNmZBHV1JopWeq
/h+bamivKT+MHYTUyimc48A3g+spMm0R1S7ZqsEpMgYmm0SdVXcVbjgovZ4npDtZ
6gPaEXR2GWJ3sfwMX/TKhY9ZGB0yUU99hQbQscKY/69V4cn/Xi4jgenxWpNXnDLU
2gyrBHiX9VA=
=CO8T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
