On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 04:03:19PM -0500, Fred Lindberg wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Aug 1999 16:40:44 +0200, torben fjerdingstad wrote:
> 
> >1) Spam_friends support on smtp level not possible. Can be done
> >   on a later level which means goodbye to rblsmtpd and hello to
> >   a flooded postmaster mailbox.
> 
> Why not put it on a separate host/IP? Leave that open. Small specific
> postmaster box. Forward mail to main box for specific users.

I don't understand. Put what on a seperate ip? Leave what open?

I could have a seperate mailbox for mailer-daemon, but I would
still have to deal with all the doublebounce messages.

Alle users have an email of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED],
so I can't control incoming mailroutes, like:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] go to MX a, while  mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] go to MX b

Adding a lookup in a spamlovers file would not cost
more than a lookup in the badmailfrom file, would it?

I wish I was clever enough to create my own patches.
Then I could also make antirbl take a wildcard domain
name, like '.dk'

-- 
Med venlig hilsen / Regards 
Netdriftgruppen / Network Management Group
UNI-C          

Tlf./Phone   +45 35 87 89 41        Mail:  UNI-C                                
Fax.         +45 35 87 89 90               Bygning 304
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]       DK-2800 Lyngby

Reply via email to