Re: 451 See http://pobox.com/~djb/docs/smtplf.html.

[Aaron Nabil]

D. J. Bernstein writes...
>Aaron Nabil writes:
>> The message in question had a "bare LF" in it, perfectly legal,
>
>Bare LFs are now categorically prohibited by 822bis. They were never
>handled correctly by sendmail. The client's behavior is inexcusable.

I guess not having access to 822bis, I'll have to ask for clarification.

Are bare LF's themselves prohibited?  Or is it the treating of bare
LF's as line terminators that is prohibited?

What about in 8BITMIME messages?  No bare LF's allowed at all?


-- 
Aaron Nabil