adam@spotted:~$ echo to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | qmail-inject
==> /var/log/qmail/@00000934589497 <==
934815785.584174 new msg 14146
934815785.584186 info msg 14146: bytes 217 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 16516 uid 1000
934815785.623605 starting delivery 26638: msg 14146 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
934815785.623626 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
934815785.678035 delivery 26638: success: did_0+0+2/
934815785.678051 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
934815785.678063 end msg 14146
adam@spotted:~$ telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 flounder.net ESMTP
mail from:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
250 ok
rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
250 ok
data
354 go ahead
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hello
.
250 ok 934815918 qp 16539
==> /var/log/qmail/@00000934589497 <==
934815918.595499 new msg 14146
934815918.595510 info msg 14146: bytes 235 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 16539 uid 71
934815918.634793 starting delivery 26640: msg 14146 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
934815918.634813 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
934815918.685727 delivery 26640: success: did_0+0+2/
934815918.685743 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
934815918.685754 end msg 14146
What's the problem?
--Adam
On Mon, Aug 16, 1999 at 10:46:22AM -0400, Gum, Greg wrote:
>
>
> I am using Qmail on a Unix system (Digital Unix) and recently had a
> complaint from my customer that a new email user was unable to connect to
> the system using Qmail. Evidently the user name needed to be upper and
> lower case in their system and possibly in our server also.
>
> Is Qmail RFC compliant with case sensitivity using mailbox user names? The
> reason I ask is Qmail seems to take all user names to lower case. I have
> heard through my peers that the RFC states that the mailbox user names need
> to be accepted as either upper case or lower case and not be converted to
> lower case. Is this true? If not would you say that Qmail is RFC
> compliant? What is your thoughts with Qmail case sensitivity? Is there a
> fix to the lower case conversion if I need to change our Qmail.
>
> Bottom line is if it is not RFC compliant and there is not a fix to the case
> sensitivity issue, then I might need to come up with a good argument not to
> replace Qmail in our system.
>
> Thank You
> Greg Gum
> Lockheed Martin
>
