On Wed, Aug 18, 1999 at 11:39:05PM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> I know, none of the above problems are outrageous, but one can spend
> considerable time on sorting out badly organized patches. (Sorry, for
> picking on the big-todo patc, but I still do not know, which one is
> the latest, www.qmail.org's or Bruce G's.)
It's certainly not mine -- I had no hand in creating this useful piece.
Whatever the qmail site points to should be authoritative for this one.
As far as versioning goes, it would probably be more useful to
date-stamp unversioned patches, to at least identify at what date the
patch originated. This way, one could identify chronological order at
least.
--
Bruce Guenter, QCC Communications Corp. EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (306)249-0220 WWW: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~bguenter/
