On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 10:25:32AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Peter van Dijk wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > Removing messages from under qmail-send's ass should not give any problems
> > theoretically, just lots of warnings in the logs.
> >
> > kill -9 qmail-send IS a bad thing tho.. you should always just kill
> > qmail-send and _wait_ for it to exit.
>
> If you're in a hurry, and want qmail-send to exit quickly, kill all the
> qmail-remote processes after you kill qmail-send (as Peter notes, don't
> use -9). You may get a few duplicate messages doing this. Your choice
> whether it's that urgent to shut it down quickly.
Actually, I do that all the time... I hate waiting for a timeout when I can
just 'killall qmail-remote'.
Just didn't want to tell y'all because it's theoretically bad :)
Greetz, Peter
--
| 'He broke my heart, | Peter van Dijk |
I broke his neck' | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
nognikz - As the sun | Hardbeat@ircnet - #cistron/#linux.nl |
http://www.nognikz.mdk.nu/ | Hardbeat@undernet - #groningen/#kinkfm/#vdh |
