On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 09:13:21AM +0300, Filippos Slavik wrote:
I'm not sure. I do remember that the author of this patch had some sort
of objection to the idea of varying the concurrency, so he instead wrote
a patch to qmail-send.
> I have already solved my problem, by using the the holdremote patch, as
> Marco Leeflang pointed me. Anyway, from your mail I see that the
> /control/concurrencyremote approach is more-less the same thing as the
> holdremote feature, so since is the same thing why the holdremote patch
> exists at all ??
--
See complete headers for more info
