In the immortal words of Fabrice Scemama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Is Nathan trying to explain that qmail sends mail so fast that it > can't be natural ? ;-) Heh, there is an element of that. Parallelizing MTAs such as qmail and Postfix present a challenge when doing frequency analysis. However, I would tend to think that this is the analyzer's problem, not qmail's. -n ------------------------------------------------------------<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I have seen the future of the net, and it's a pimply 14-year old boy shouting "ADD ME TO THE LIST!!!!11!!!" Forever. <http://www.blank.org/memory/>------------------------------------------------
- Re: Lobby mail.com Nathan J. Mehl
- Re: Lobby mail.com Fabrice Scemama
- Re: Lobby mail.com Einar Bordewich
- Re: Lobby mail.com Thomas M. Sasala
- Re: Lobby mail.com Sam
- Check the RCPT TO: against Russell Nelson
- Re: Check the RCPT TO: against Einar Bordewich
- Re: Check the RCPT TO: against Balazs Nagy
- Re: Check the RCPT TO: against Einar Bordewich
- Re: Check the RCPT TO: against Sam
- Re: Lobby mail.com Nathan J. Mehl
- Re: Lobby mail.com Paul Farber
- Re: Lobby mail.com Sam
- RE: Lobby mail.com Ben Kosse
- RE: Lobby mail.com James J. Lippard
- Re: Lobby mail.com Sam
- RE: Lobby mail.com Cris Daniluk
- Re: Lobby mail.com Adam D . McKenna
- RE: Lobby mail.com Cris Daniluk
- Re: Lobby mail.com Adam D . McKenna
- Re: Lobby mail.com Sam
